chat about inactive ruby users

[fusion]

o.k. lets talk about whether or not we should put inactives that bought rubies into VM or if we should just leave them as they are

start out by explaining what you think the rule should be
and why
-mod fusion

[Elmstreet666]

what do you mean. Inactive people are always treated as normal people. Rubie buyiers or not?

[fusion]

no
if you look at different players like lucky and btb and more they stay in the game and never go away because they bought rubies
so we are debating on what should happen to them
if they should go into VM
or just stay as inactives

[Liam_Jay]

i say just stay as inactives
why would you want to make there more vaca moders that we cant attack , it just doesnt make sense at all think about it
EVERYONE has complained about the long term vaca moders and you are the first ive heard og complaining about inactives even though im not attackin (i)z there good for begginers if anything all long term v moders should be made inactive and chucked out v mode

[fusion]

i actually think there should be something separate for them like inactive ruby users or something just so everybody knows
-mod fusion

[Gator]

If anybody cares what I think, I'll indulge by telling them.

Non ruby buyers are gone after 30 days inactive, give the ruby buyers 2 extra months.

I do not know if there is a time limit for v-mode, but if there is, the ruby buyers should have the advantage of extra time, BUT NOT PERMANENT!

Who agrees with me? Who disagrees and why?

[fusion]

yeah thats sort of what i meant a different class that they would be put into
and i think it should be like 1 month not 2 because if they bought rubies and were still into the game they would come back by then
i myself wouldn't buy rubies and then quit
-mod fusion

[Gator]

So you agree with me, right?

Thats 2 of us, anybody else?

[fusion]

yes i do agree whoever agrees and or disagrees let us know by putting it up here

[Gator]

I'll try to get people to visit and post their opinion.