Page 2 of 2

Re: Vote for chat

Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 9:26 pm
by Mudkipz
Voted. This game needs a chat.

Re: Vote for chat

Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 11:20 am
by jinx
Chat vote: YES!!! :)

Re: Vote for chat

Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 2:50 pm
by suresh
even when this gets 1K votes to yes i dont think this will get implemented :(

Re: Vote for chat

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 4:20 am
by starfucker
How many poeple play this game the forums seem kinda bare? Are they all playing other space mmo type games? Anyone here of this PS3 game Dust517 or whatver i dont remember the actual numbers but it is a first person shooter like BF3 that will plug into the BattleforSerios universe affecting gameplay in BattleforSerious. Seems like a very cool idea!

Re: Vote for chat

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 4:44 am
by Demon Azrakel
Definitely needs a chat system...

Re: Vote for chat

Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2011 2:32 am
by bubbles
chat for rubies

pay 1 rubie for like 4 week chat or somet ????

Re: Vote for chat

Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2011 3:48 pm
by Hades
im not going to pay rubies for chat,
Chat should be implemented to get people playing.
A new guy joins and needs help, he cant join an alliance coz they all want 5K points minimum, there isnt a chat, he quits.
It will also get comunication up among the servers,
which will help make the game a bit more interesting being able to talk about hits or general daily things that people be doing on here/in general.

So it helps both people stay interested, as well as give help to noobs, and gives something to do while here.

May be that comunication that actually helps encorage people to use the forums

Re: Vote for chat

Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2011 3:11 am
by bubbles
80% of players dont use forum's but i know 90% will use chat tho


atm my alliance use's skype for chat and since i convinced some ppl on to it we bin workin as a team alot better and questions get answerd faster and stuff

Re: Vote for chat

Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2011 3:14 am
by fusion
lets face it i dont think there will be anything new on here unless updated somewhere else