Page 3 of 3
Re: fireonice vs AOW
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 3:18 pm
by suresh
everyone is bad in war but they just wont say it ...if some one says they are bad they are just telling us they want to be bad
well this is what i think
Re: fireonice vs AOW
Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 6:51 am
by fireonice
Well for people who thought the war was over. I have news for them. It's not over.
fireonice (,,,^o.o^,,,CATS,,,^o.o^,,,) vs. -spamme- (Soldiers Of Mayhem)
The attacker has won the battle !
You receive 799750 units of Metal, 789532 units of Crystal and 447460 units of Deuterium.
The attacker has lost a total of 0 units.
The defender has lost a total of 82.187.500 units.
A debris field containing 36.396.000 units of Metal and 12.916.500 units of Crystal has formed in orbit around the planet.
The probability of creating a moon is : 18 %
DF collected.
You collect; 36.396.000 units of Metal and 12.916.500 units of Crystal.
Re: fireonice vs AOW
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:45 pm
by fireonice
FOI vs Elmstreet
Attacker Loss: 0 Defender Loss:330.000
winnings Metal:4.125.555 Crystal:2.000.598 Deuterium:1.822.813
Debris Metal:18.000 Crystal:180.000
Re: fireonice vs AOW
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 2:30 pm
by suresh
NICE profits.........
Re: fireonice vs AOW
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 1:55 am
by Liam_Jay
fireonice wrote:FOI vs Elmstreet
Attacker Loss: 0 Defender Loss:330.000
winnings Metal:4.125.555 Crystal:2.000.598 Deuterium:1.822.813
Debris Metal:18.000 Crystal:180.000
That was careless
